Author Topic: [LTCGear] legit discussion  (Read 578757 times)

Offline TheMage

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6840
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3360 on: July 06, 2015, 02:44:53 AM »
So I'm confused ... have we given up on LTCGear not being legit?    I've pretty much decided it is legit because of where paid out LTC is coming from.   At least there a lot of mining being done.
pay out LTC coming from cryptsy address.
The address I traced back was Solo Miner#3.  https://www.litecoinpool.org/pools 
Basically I was double checking someone else's claim as I was paid in BTC.   So it wasn't my payment address. 

LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr - From that address, the few deposits I checked at random all went back to  LUuMPUYRcNjngcWy3SugMM6cQb1WwpMyr9 which is Solo Miner#3, but through a second address. 

So if the first address is a cryptsy address, it appears to be funded by real mining.   

The person that initially posted his address was on the main thread.   I haven't directly confirmed this with my own coins.
i have posted it on main thread as well.

remember that almost all ltc/blocks are generating from these huge miners listed. so almost all transactions should end up in one of those giant miners or pools, that doesn't prove the miner belongs to the payee.

LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr  appears to be the main hot wallet of cryptsy exchange
all coins mining in solominer 3 are coming to LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr via another address as you said, but thats not the only source LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr getting coins from. its getting coins from everywhere and sending coins to lot of other addresses (appears to be cold wallets and other 2nd level hot wallets)

It was probably your post I was looking at.   I was just surprised by that multiple deposits we checked at random when back to the solominer3.    While it isn't 100% proof it is a good start.  However since beekeeper changes coins and sends out many payments it makes sense that something like cryptsy would be used.

Having some issues posting here. Likely my wifi. Sorry if it double posts

I know its an older post but it was brought up in the bitcointalk thread below

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1103670.0;topicseen

The address does not belong to cryptsy. I have checked the database for a matching user and no results.

main hot wallet does not own the address
Code: [Select]
litecoin-cli validateaddress LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr
{
    "isvalid" : true,
    "address" : "LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr",
    "ismine" : false
}

And our storage addresses would not have any debits for 6+ months only credits

Wish we could be of more help

If you were paid out by an address you believed to belong to cryptsy. I can verify if we own it. But not who the address belongs to.

Hi Mullick :)

Offline tryingcrypto

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 31
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3361 on: July 07, 2015, 11:38:49 AM »
So....when is this "legit" LTCgear Q&A happening?

Offline Totscha

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 987
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3362 on: July 07, 2015, 12:01:34 PM »
So....when is this "legit" LTCgear Q&A happening?

Soon (TM)

Offline Deki1904

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 197

Offline CryptoCat

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
  • Stay Calm ... in the face of Non Payment

Offline Noogens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 654
  • Grumpy-Cat prefers Deathmetal
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3365 on: July 07, 2015, 04:19:23 PM »
Webpage still asks us to wait till June 24...
Guess he ran for it, or is making holidays, while ltc prices rises. :-[

Offline miter_myles

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • ORLY?

Offline gentacomp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3367 on: July 08, 2015, 10:57:34 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..

Offline wfever

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3368 on: July 08, 2015, 11:07:00 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..
What? Unless your account has over 4000 qasics it won't have the option to convert to hardware.

Offline gentacomp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3369 on: July 08, 2015, 11:12:27 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..
What? Unless your account has over 4000 qasics it won't have the option to convert to hardware.
I got multiple account, and the first one I use is 4573. So there is still 1403 remaining after I choose 2nd option.

BUUUTTT on second thought I got another problem
Maintenance fee doesnt changes. So this 1403 qasic still need a 4573 maintenance fee (arround 7.7btc). So is this bad news ?

Offline wfever

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3370 on: July 08, 2015, 11:13:56 PM »
We're expecting (hoping) another sync will ensue that fixes the fee to match the new share amount after conversion.

Offline artilectinc

  • Litecoin Association Member
  • Elite Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2138
  • Troll Paladin
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3371 on: July 08, 2015, 11:14:50 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..
What? Unless your account has over 4000 qasics it won't have the option to convert to hardware.
I got multiple account, and the first one I use is 4573. So there is still 1403 remaining after I choose 2nd option.

BUUUTTT on second thought I got another problem
Maintenance fee doesnt changes. So this 1403 qasic still need a 4573 maintenance fee (arround 7.7btc). So is this bad news ?

maint fee for those remaining shares is supposed to update during a 2nd sync.

Offline Totscha

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 987
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3372 on: July 09, 2015, 12:28:34 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..
What? Unless your account has over 4000 qasics it won't have the option to convert to hardware.
I got multiple account, and the first one I use is 4573. So there is still 1403 remaining after I choose 2nd option.

BUUUTTT on second thought I got another problem
Maintenance fee doesnt changes. So this 1403 qasic still need a 4573 maintenance fee (arround 7.7btc). So is this bad news ?

maint fee for those remaining shares is supposed to update during a 2nd sync.

Speculation?

Offline gentacomp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3373 on: July 09, 2015, 08:48:33 PM »
Soo....
I did choose 2nd option that convert 3170 qasic to 350mh hardware
Now I got 400 qasic and 3000 qasic in 2 account. Is transfer feature still locked ?
I hope bee can help me for this..
What? Unless your account has over 4000 qasics it won't have the option to convert to hardware.
I got multiple account, and the first one I use is 4573. So there is still 1403 remaining after I choose 2nd option.

BUUUTTT on second thought I got another problem
Maintenance fee doesnt changes. So this 1403 qasic still need a 4573 maintenance fee (arround 7.7btc). So is this bad news ?

maint fee for those remaining shares is supposed to update during a 2nd sync.

Speculation?

Or the hardware shipped if I pay for the fee
And another extra for shipping
And of course there would be tax too

OMG, is it trap ?

Offline deeneendo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 174
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3374 on: July 15, 2015, 08:40:12 AM »
Hope makes dumb.