Author Topic: [LTCGear] legit discussion  (Read 593505 times)

Offline ljuni0rl

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3345 on: June 27, 2015, 12:27:44 PM »
Did everyone hear Scrypt.cc pulled a LTCGEAR. Same exactg MO. DB hacked,fake acct, shares added.
It would be great, If you could share a URL or more details in relation to this news.

Offline dykask

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 567
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3346 on: June 27, 2015, 01:55:56 PM »
Did everyone hear Scrypt.cc pulled a LTCGEAR. Same exactg MO. DB hacked,fake acct, shares added.
It would be great, If you could share a URL or more details in relation to this news.

Nothing like LTCgear.   That Admin is keeping people updated.   Check it out yourself at scrypt.cc

Offline AU_AG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3347 on: June 27, 2015, 03:40:08 PM »
There are similarities.

He cam back. Possibly for a round 3 (Rinse and repeat).

Who knows. First medical thing, then power outage, Now this.

Each time a perfect opp for admin to buy CHEAP CHEAP shares and sell at multiples (or accumulate).

then again who knows.

Offline AU_AG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3348 on: June 27, 2015, 03:41:52 PM »
https://scrypt.cc/index.php

Admin keeping us updating.

So isnt chris
« Last Edit: June 27, 2015, 11:51:53 PM by AU_AG »

Offline kmg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3349 on: June 28, 2015, 07:10:33 PM »
I had a dream, and in that dream some people took their time (about six months) to create several new users on the forum and make some posts.  During that time they also created new users in their database with all kinds of nice stuff there.  Then they put some lower fees in that database to those new users they created and also some old users just to make it look good.

Then I woke up, so you have to fill the rest yourself  ;)

Offline cashman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 394
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3350 on: June 30, 2015, 04:31:35 PM »
looks like Bitcagetech posted 2014 results not sure if this has already been discussed.

http://www.romanian-companies.eu/bitcage-tech-srl-31906463/

http://www.risco.ro/verifica-firma/bitcage-tech-cui-31906463


(Please remove post if this is not allowed to be posted)

« Last Edit: June 30, 2015, 04:42:38 PM by cashman »

Offline Noogens

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 654
  • Grumpy-Cat prefers Deathmetal
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3351 on: June 30, 2015, 05:14:24 PM »
weird figures

Offline Forceflow

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3352 on: June 30, 2015, 06:10:22 PM »
looks like Bitcagetech posted 2014 results not sure if this has already been discussed.

http://www.romanian-companies.eu/bitcage-tech-srl-31906463/

http://www.risco.ro/verifica-firma/bitcage-tech-cui-31906463


(Please remove post if this is not allowed to be posted)

I don't think that's an issue on the forum because its not info about people, just a company (publicly filed doc too).  Thanks for posting -- I find it somewhat informative but it loses importance compared to the current crisis (but the documents indicate some liquidity that can be used to satisfy a judgment).

Offline p2p

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3353 on: June 30, 2015, 06:23:38 PM »
looks like Bitcagetech posted 2014 results not sure if this has already been discussed.

http://www.romanian-companies.eu/bitcage-tech-srl-31906463/

http://www.risco.ro/verifica-firma/bitcage-tech-cui-31906463


(Please remove post if this is not allowed to be posted)

just lol

sales of aprox $250 k
and profit of $25 k

i believe only 1 week of qasic sales made more then $250 k

Offline mullick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3354 on: June 30, 2015, 07:08:51 PM »
So I'm confused ... have we given up on LTCGear not being legit?    I've pretty much decided it is legit because of where paid out LTC is coming from.   At least there a lot of mining being done.
pay out LTC coming from cryptsy address.
The address I traced back was Solo Miner#3.  https://www.litecoinpool.org/pools 
Basically I was double checking someone else's claim as I was paid in BTC.   So it wasn't my payment address. 

LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr - From that address, the few deposits I checked at random all went back to  LUuMPUYRcNjngcWy3SugMM6cQb1WwpMyr9 which is Solo Miner#3, but through a second address. 

So if the first address is a cryptsy address, it appears to be funded by real mining.   

The person that initially posted his address was on the main thread.   I haven't directly confirmed this with my own coins.
i have posted it on main thread as well.

remember that almost all ltc/blocks are generating from these huge miners listed. so almost all transactions should end up in one of those giant miners or pools, that doesn't prove the miner belongs to the payee.

LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr  appears to be the main hot wallet of cryptsy exchange
all coins mining in solominer 3 are coming to LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr via another address as you said, but thats not the only source LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr getting coins from. its getting coins from everywhere and sending coins to lot of other addresses (appears to be cold wallets and other 2nd level hot wallets)

It was probably your post I was looking at.   I was just surprised by that multiple deposits we checked at random when back to the solominer3.    While it isn't 100% proof it is a good start.  However since beekeeper changes coins and sends out many payments it makes sense that something like cryptsy would be used.

Having some issues posting here. Likely my wifi. Sorry if it double posts

I know its an older post but it was brought up in the bitcointalk thread below

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1103670.0;topicseen

The address does not belong to cryptsy. I have checked the database for a matching user and no results.

main hot wallet does not own the address
Code: [Select]
litecoin-cli validateaddress LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr
{
    "isvalid" : true,
    "address" : "LXA3i9eEAVDbgDqkThCa4D6BUJ3SEULkEr",
    "ismine" : false
}

And our storage addresses would not have any debits for 6+ months only credits

Wish we could be of more help

If you were paid out by an address you believed to belong to cryptsy. I can verify if we own it. But not who the address belongs to.

Offline Sukarti

  • Hardcore Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3355 on: June 30, 2015, 07:40:30 PM »
EULkEr is a BTC-E hot wallet.

Deposit LTC @BTC-E, within a hop or two it lands there.

Request LTC, it comes from that address within a hop or two.

The intermittent hops are just transaction aggregates.

Offline augustito

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3356 on: June 30, 2015, 09:49:00 PM »
so.... the Q&A? still pending?

Offline Volunteers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 140
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3357 on: July 01, 2015, 12:18:55 AM »
so.... the Q&A? still pending?
Lol!

Offline monkeydong1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 161
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3358 on: July 01, 2015, 12:32:53 AM »
Wow, such a good deal ltcgear. Have you seen how fast is the ROI ??

Offline Totscha

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 987
Re: [LTCGear] legit discussion
« Reply #3359 on: July 01, 2015, 08:03:38 AM »
looks like Bitcagetech posted 2014 results not sure if this has already been discussed.

http://www.romanian-companies.eu/bitcage-tech-srl-31906463/

http://www.risco.ro/verifica-firma/bitcage-tech-cui-31906463


(Please remove post if this is not allowed to be posted)

I think only the Scriptor 8x sales are include here. And maybe not even 100% of those. The Romanians are as good at tax evasion as the Greeks of Italians ;)